The line graphs below illustrate data related to cinema attendance in Australia over 1990 to present and a prediction to 2010.
Overall, the historical and projected ratios were limited in 40% to 98% boundary in where the percentages of youngest people was constantly top, middle-aged adults had the average enthusiasm and finally despite the increasing trend, the oldest crowd was the least enthusiastic for cinema over the given period.
In 1990 the top rate of attendance was related to the youngest population, by 90%, while two the second biggest proportions happened in two middle-aged groups around 60% and the bottommost ratio was in the oldest part of crowd, by 40%.
Over 1990 to 1996, except the initiate of the period, tendency of all members of categories was mostly rising; the rates reached at 95% (as a peak), 75%, 72% and finally 50%, through 4 groups from the youngsters to elderlies, respectively.
Except 25-34 year-olds category, others’ ratios met a falling trend during 1996 preceding in succession plateaus until 2002 when a gentle upward trend happened simultaneously in two groups of oldest people, a fractional drop occurred in the group of 25-34 year-olds and finally a long-term levelled-off emerged until 2008 in youngsters.
It is projected that the youths, 35-49 and 50+ groups, to peak at 98%, 85% and 60% and during the same period 25-34 year olds fall at just over 70% in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'second the biggest'.
Suggestion: second the biggest
...ngest population, by 90%, while the two second biggest proportions happened in two middle-aged...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the oldest'.
Suggestion: of the oldest
...d happened simultaneously in two groups of oldest people, a fractional drop occurred in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95757575758 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80511143054 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648484848485 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.0312427156 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 204.5 112.824112599 181% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.25 22.9334400587 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.036014084957 0.215688989381 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023740302107 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0156035012806 0.0843802449381 18% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.023740302107 0.15604864568 15% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156035012806 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 13.2329268293 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.7 10.3012195122 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.38 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.