the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world
The provided line graph illustrates the number of overseas tourist destinations in various places in the world in the 1990-2005 period.
From first glance, there were significant rises in all figures for people who arrived abroad during the 15-year.
In the beginning, the majority of international travelers belonged to North America, at approximately 70 million. Nevertheless, this figure was nearly 7-fold as high as people who moved to Sub-Saharan Africa in 1990. Central and Eastern Europe and South-East Asia contributed the second (roughly 30 million) and the third-ranking (nearly 20 million) respectively in the first year.
Regarding the data, it is noticeable that there was the largest change by over 60 million in the number of overseas visitors lading in Central and Eastern Europe throughout 15 years. As a result, North America shared equal figures for international travelers in comparison with central and Eastern Europe after considerable upward trends, which formed just under 90 million. While having the same data at about 10 million in 1990, the figure for visitors from abroad who went to Sub-Saharan Africa was about 5 million higher than in South America in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | hien3112 | 75 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-05 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | hunghoang | 84 | view |
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that t 78
- the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world 78
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, third, while, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33510638298 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83866687926 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4829714183 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0850566144136 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396461316084 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434110870714 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621653923363 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454407047573 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.