The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries.
The line chart compares the number of travelers visiting worldwide in five countries over 15 years, commencing in 1995
From a general perspective, a glance at the graph reveals that all five countries show an upward trajectory throughout the period. Also, While the USA and France were the most popular destinations for tourists, the opposite was true for Brazil and Egypt.
In terms of the USA and France, It is clear that the increase in France's figures was more quickly than in Brazil. Specifically, Whereas a ceaseless climb was noticed in Brazil, the number of France visitors intensified significantly to 65 million in 2000 and again between 2005 and 2010. Subsequently, the year 2010 marked the point at which France caught up with Brazil regarding travelers number at precisely 90 million.
Turning to Malaysia, Egypt, and Brazil, a marked similar trend in those countries' data, despite the differences at the initial year, grew steadily over the timeline. In detail, Brazil and Egypt stood at under 10 million at the same time and climbed to 20 and 18 million in 2010 respectively. Moreover, a roughly 25 million increase was witnessed in Malaysia, which was higher than the sum of both Egypt and Brazil variation, collectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | dorae | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | 100 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | view |
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries 11
- Everyone deserves to be educated It s unfair that intelligent people are not admitted to private universities because of their financial background University education should be free for everyone Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if nece 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The chart below shows the movement of people from rural to urban areas in three countries and predictions for future years 89
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries over 15 years, commencing in 1995 From a general perspective, a glance at ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pposite was true for Brazil and Egypt. In terms of the USA and France, It is cl...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...velers number at precisely 90 million. Turning to Malaysia, Egypt, and Brazil, ...
^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...Brazil, a marked similar trend in those countries data, despite the differences at the in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07843137255 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77727984772 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7730101262 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0582597745904 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0247111023057 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524626611547 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05073261519 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421401722254 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.