The graph below gives information about the technology that households in one US city used for watching television between 2004 and 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the number of homes in one US city using four different distribution channels (Satellite, Cable, Internet, and Broadcast) to watch television during a period of 10 years.
Overall, the number of homes who used satellite and the Internet channels for watching TV increased gradually, while the figures for those using cable and broadcast channels decreased through the period shown.
In 2004, the number of households using broadcast channels was around 100,000. In the same year, cable and satellite channels were used by about 90,000 and 70,000 families respectively. The number of homes using the Internet channels was the lowest, at around 10,000, but six years later, it overtook other distribution channels as the primary source of technology.
From 2004 to 2014, the Internet channels usage for television rose constantly and reached a peak of some 190,000. By contrast, the figure for broadcast channels declined significantly to only around 10,000. There was a slight increase in the number of households choosing cable channels by about 30,000 in 2008 before falling continuously to 60,000 at the end of the period. The figure for families using satellite channels grew steadily by around 40,000 over the 10-year period.
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- The graph below gives information about the technology that households in one US city used for watching television between 2004 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 84
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to cable'
Suggestion: to cable
...se in the number of households choosing cable channels by about 30,000 in 2008 before...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36868686869 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69699334155 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540404040404 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9462917807 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129457368685 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723122562053 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042681354356 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102280866323 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341547665614 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.