The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030
The line graph demonstrates the total oil use of 4 main consumers between 2009 and 2030.
In general, US, Western Europe and Japan consumed less oil throughout 6 years and are predicted to decrease in the next 15 years. By contrast, the total oil spent by China and Middle East were slightly increased over the period of 2009 and 2015 and tends to rise up in 2030.
In 2009, US consumed almost 10 millions barrels of oil per day, this number was by far 3 other areas. The figure then remained relatively constant from 2009 to 2015 and starts to decline from 2015. The number is anticipated to sharply declined to about 4 millions barrels in 2030. Besides, 4 millions barrels of oil was the figure of Western Europe and Japan in 2009, these regions also followed the same trend as US and are expected to be about 2 millions barrels per day in the year 2030.
By contrast, China and Middle East used only 2 millions barrels of oil in 2009, this data then slightly increased to about 3 millions barrels with China and almost didn’t vary with Middle East in 2015. Both areas are anticipated to fluctuate and reach the number of about 3 millions barrels per day in 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-08 | Guri473812 | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-20 | vonhuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | dinhthu05 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-26 | shubham0708 | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of films produced by 5 different countries in 3 years 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- Imprisonment statistic 61
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 Europe countries from 2000 to 2012 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57547169811 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37218664757 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471698113208 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8979006486 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30459051064 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154047355557 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12638459413 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246659480299 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152202780188 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.