The graph below shows information about the total oil consumption of four major consumers from 2009 to 2030.
The given line graph delineates the consumption of total oil in four nations between 2009 and 2030.
On analysis the data, it can be clearly seen that in 2009, the consumption of oil was recorded the highest in US, which accounted for 10 millions barrels per day. It remained same in 2015, but it is rejected that this number will be decreased to 4 millions of barrels per day. Middle east consumed almost 2 millions of barrels per day in 2009 and it showed slight rise in 2015. In 2030, it is estimated the number would be 3 millions of barrels per day.
In 2009, western Europe and Japan displayed an opposite trend then China in the consumption of oil. They consumed similar amount of oil, constituting almost 3 millions of barrels per day in 2015. It is predicted that in 2030, both countries will be showed an opposite trend.
Overall, in future, the consumption of oil will be observed highest in US and the lowest in western Europe and Japan but in the case of China and Middle East it will be remained same.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-08 | Guri473812 | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-03 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | dinhthu05 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that governments should provide subsidies to farmers to produce cheap healthy food Others think that governments should tax companies producing unhealthy foods Give your own opinion and examples 73
- We live today in electronic information age It is easier to be connected by thechnology Yet many people seem no closer to feeling happy in their lives Discuss 78
- More and more plastic waste has polluted oceans What problems does it cause And what measures can be taken 73
- The bar chart represents water use given in the percentage in a number of different regions in 1995 90
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European county between 1979 and 2004
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...d that this number will be decreased to 4 millions of barrels per day. Middle east consumed a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...ls per day. Middle east consumed almost 2 millions of barrels per day in 2009 and it showed s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
...30, it is estimated the number would be 3 millions of barrels per day. In 2009, western Eu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
...ilar amount of oil, constituting almost 3 millions of barrels per day in 2015. It is predicte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e showed an opposite trend. Overall, in future, the consumption of oil will be observe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54054054054 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4584553935 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6990589405 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218565195235 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112436836502 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999908946697 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176422539535 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121118640105 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.