The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates a 2008 report about the amount of four different fuel sources used in America since 1980 with projections through 2030.

Overall, there was a significant increase in most of the consumption of energy but hydro power. It was also noticeable that petrol and oil was consumed mostly while the opposite was true for hydro power.

In the starting year, petrol and oil and coal began as the two most popular energies, still went up between 1985 and 2015. Both of them are expected to keep rising considerably in the next 15 years. On the other hand, natural gas, despite experiencing a gradual peak of about 5% up to 2015, tend to flatten out at around 25%.

Besides, nuclear and solar/wind, which had a slight increase, are projected to remain stabled from 2015 to 2015 before growing a little bit in 2030. According to the data, hydro power, the least-used at the beginning, is likely to level off over the period between 2015 and 2030 after fluctuating in the first 30 years.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates a 2008 report...
^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...bled from 2015 to 2015 before growing a little bit in 2030. According to the data, hydro p...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, still, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77714285714 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49908391379 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691428571429 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9695421952 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124679965089 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529087545753 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720991056509 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833256634238 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082268192141 0.0819641961636 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.