The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social center in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020. Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparison where relevant
The line graph shows how many people there are for five activities in one place in Melbourne, Australia, in the period of 21 years starting from 2000.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the number of people in three types of activities changed considerably. However; participants in film club and martial arts remain unchanged in the surveyed years.
Looking at the details, in 2000, there were nearly 26 people who joined amateur dramatics, and it had decreased to 20 persons in 2010 before increasing rapidly from 20 to about 50 in 2020. By contrast, the Film club and amateur dramatics still remained stable with 70 and roughly 37 people respectively and the Film club still reached the highest position in the graph.
Another significant feature is that the number of participants in table tennis has changed rapidly. Initially, they went up slightly in the first five years surveyed, then plummeted from roughly 28 in 2006 to under 10 in 2020. The number of people in Musical performances was not available in 2000, and appeared in 2005 and then up to just under 20 members afterward. This trend makes amateur dramatics from the third position to the lowest position.
- the plans below show a harbour in 2000 and how it looks today Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social center in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison whe 84
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to these places 67
Comments
The gameplay on 101 games is…
The gameplay on 101 games is designed to be engaging and addictive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, still, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94472361809 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63793729338 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613065326633 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9722114972 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15374104342 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061270511742 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536507232809 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098366859381 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587254096716 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.