The line chart compares the number of internet users in three different countries (The USA, Canada and Mexico) between 1999 and 2009. Overall, it is apparent that the most significant number of internet users was in Canada, while the least was in Mexico.
In the initial year, just about 10% of Canadians had access to the internet. In the following year (2001) the proportion of internet users in Canada was two fold that of the initial year and then, the figure significantly improved to about 60% in 2003. After that, the proportion of Canadians using the internet increased sharply to about 80% in 2007 and in the final year it is shown that all Canadians accessed the internet. Conversely, The number of Americans using the internet in 1999 was the largest, and it doubled in the following two years. Between 2001 and 2005, the figure showed a significant increase to about 70%. From 2007 to 2007, the number of internet users in the USA grew marginally and ended the period at just 80%.
In Mexico, at the beginning of the period, approximately 5% of Mexicans used the internet and the proportion of internet users in Mexico rose to about 10% next year, followed by a steady increase between 2001 and 2005. The trend continued for 2007 to 2009 and in the final year, it was reported that only 40% of Mexicans accessed the internet.
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people believe that children should obey rules and listen to their parents and teachers Some others believe that less control will help children deal with their adult life Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7094017094 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50456519406 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440170940171 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1943124129 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279181406505 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133014692345 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115499684331 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241291758858 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107137276271 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.