the graph below show radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992
The graph below indicate the radio and television viewers all of a day in 1992 of UK.
At quick glance at the graph reveals that the percentage of television audiences is higher than the radio spectators at midnight. On the other hand, the persons, who like the radio, are greater than the television viewers at noon.
The number of person, like watching the television increased absolutely from 6am to 8pm. This is jumped rapidly from 5 percent to approximately 45 percent in 12 hours. However, a huge of viewers dropped steadily from 45 percent to nearly 5 percent in 6 hours later.
Beside that the radio audiences rose dramatically at near 30 percent in 2 hours at noon. But the number of spectators dropped steeply from 8am to 6 am tomorrow. At 4am, the viewers are the lowest in the percentage of population in UK. Even though, this is under 5 percent of the television viewers at 6am.
It is worth noting that the population of UK prefers listening to the radio to the TV at noon. Conversely, when the sky is becoming darkly, the TV is better option than the radio in UK for almost person over 4 years old in 1992.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The line graph below shows the average daily maximum temperatures for Auckland and Christchurch, two cities in New Zealand, and London and Edinburgh, two cities in United Kingdom.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in fiveEuropean countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 78
- the graph below show radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55665024631 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63244151995 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507389162562 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.114634146341 1745% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.8024970367 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0833333333 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9166666667 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222876433533 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922435373533 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124020078452 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168941822488 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156849326386 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.