The graph below show the viewership of different TV programs among the three different age groups summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below show the viewership of different TV programs among the three different age groups summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make where relevant.

The given Pie Charts provided the information about different TV programmes watched by three distinguishable age groups.
Regarding the first pie chart, sports and Cartoon programmes are very dominate channels in the teenager group. Afterwards, 10 to 15 years old age group are opting drama and film serial, which are around a quarter. News programme watched by a small number of these adolescent.
It is clear that, viewers of sport and cartoon telecast are decreased slightly in the 16 to 20 years old age group. The ratio of viewers are increased remarkably from drama, news and film in the young age group.
Furthermore, the popularity of news is doubled of that 16 to 20 years old with 33 % of this group watching news. Drama, film and cartoon and equally popular in this age group with around 20 percentage watching these programme and watching sports at least popular among young adult group age.
Who are all watching news for programme are much in favor among the older age groups.

Votes
Average: 8 (15 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...nd a quarter. News programme watched by a small number of these adolescent. It is clear that, vi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... percentage watching these programme and watching sports at least popular among y...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, regarding, at least

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58659080934 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1690709089 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145723297243 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687206917236 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554638111905 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985025555611 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543543658743 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.