The given line graph illustrates the amount of acid produced in mouth by consuming sweet foods ( honey, sugarcane and fruitsugar) and within what time they are most likely to cause tooth decay. The graph is plotted against time and pH-levels. Higher the pH-level lower the acid produced in the mouth which means less chances of tooth decay.
Overall, it is clear from the multi-linear graph that cane sugar's effect remains in the mouth for long time and it is more harmful for our teeth as compared to other two.
Analyzing the graph it becomes lucid that 5.5 is the pH-level above which the chances of tooth decay occurrence are the least and vice-versa. Within 5 minutes of consumption of these foods, the pH-level drops rapidly and reaches to 3.5 due to cane sugar, just above 4 because of fruit sugar and almost 5 as a result of consuming honey.
This means that honey is the one that produces the least amount of acid in the mouth. Also, honey is the one that takes around 12 to 13 minutes to neutralize (fastest of the three). Comparatively, cane sugar requires 30-35 minutes while fruit sugar needs around 20 minutes to nullify its effect in mouth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oduced in mouth by consuming sweet foods honey, sugarcane and fruitsugar and with...
^^
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... acid produced in the mouth which means less chances of tooth decay. Overall, it ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32978367351 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546798029557 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8214270896 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42086085158 0.215688989381 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166505630137 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112765682874 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225162095178 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11682134729 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.