The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three
companies over a period of 15 years.
The given line graph details the statistical survey describing how much quantity of waste(in tonnes) is produced by three given companies namely A, B, and C over a period of 15 years from 2000 to 2015.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over time a reverse trend was witnessed in the amount of waste produced by all the three companies. Although the company A was producing the maximum waste at the start, with the passing time, company C overrode company A in the same.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, company A led the chart by contributing about 12 tonnes of the waste in the environment as compared to company B( just below 9 tonnes), and company C, who made nearly 4 tonnes of the waste. However, in the next 5 years, whilst company A slacked down by a tonne, company B and C rose substantially to 10 tonnes and 6 tonnes respectively.
Further, despite company A continued to plummet to a low of just 8 tonnes in a decade, company C experienced a significant increase before surpassing company C by dramatically rising to a peak of approximately 10 tonnes. In contrast, followed by a sharp plunge, company B fell below company C to the lowest of 3 tonnes by the period end.
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 84
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 11
- Long term international migration emigration and net migration from 1999 to 2008 89
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92589684977 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557077625571 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8885599132 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378102887604 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172998293496 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721793033707 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222570879025 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688630306188 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.