The line graph compares three companies in terms of the waste they produced between 2000 and 2015.
It is clear that the volume of waste produced by company A increased constantly over the period shown. Company B as well as company C produced less and less waste during this period.
In 2000, company A created around 12 tones of waste, compared with company B and company C which produced around 8 tones and 4 tones respectively. The production of waste by company C increased gradually, reaching over 9 tones in 2015. By contrast, the figure for waste production by company A kept dropping to 3 tones.
A dramatic increase in waste production was seen in both company C and company A from 2000 to 2005, with the amount of waste produced by company B reaching a peak of approximately 10 tones and the figure for company C rising to 6 tones. However, the waste that company B produced immediately saw a considerate decline after 2005 and dramatically fell to 3 tones.
- Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government while others think this is a good idea Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some people believe that the best way to build a happier society is to ensure that there are only small differences between the richest and the poorest members To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 the second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same period 84
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
...as seen in both company C and company A from 2000 to 2005, with the amount of waste ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7134502924 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76912780628 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485380116959 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7825212038 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365825439165 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197449733633 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679201577527 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258408050151 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548634488653 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.