The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The line graph illustrates the total of waste which three companies produced from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, the waste produced by company A and B began to decrease in 15 years, but the opposite was true for the figure of waste made by company C. The number of waste created by company B experienced the most significant change over the period shown.
Now, turning to the details, in 2000, company A produced 12 tonnes of waste. This figure was roughly 4 higher than the quantity of waste of company B, and only 4 tonnes of junk were produced by company C.
Over the next 15 years, the total waste of company A began to fall gradually to slightly over 9 tonnes. The amount of litter of company B reached the peak of 10 tonnes in 2005, and then declined considerably to 3 tonnes in 2015. By contrast, the quantity of junk of company C experienced a steady grow at the end of the period, with around 10 tonnes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nnes of junk were produced by company C. Over the next 15 years, the total waste...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 5, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unk were produced by company C. Over the next 15 years, the total waste of co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 747.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44642857143 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46568714464 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505952380952 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4205778567 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.375 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394565905676 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175182557607 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707012219551 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246851538153 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507833420848 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.