The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The line graph compares three companies in terms of their waste output
between the years 2000 and 2015.
It is clear that there were significant changes in the amounts of waste
produced by all three companies shown on the graph. While companies
A and B saw waste output fall over the 15-year period, the amount of
waste produced by company C increased considerably.
In 2000, company A produced 12 tonnes of waste, while companies B
and C produced around 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes of waste material
respectively. Over the following 5 years, the waste output of companies
B and C rose by around 2 tonnes, but the figure for company A fell by
approximately 1 tonne.
From 2005 to 2015, company A cut waste production by roughly 3
tonnes, and company B reduced its waste by around 7 tonnes. By
contrast, company C saw an increase in waste production of
approximately 4 tonnes over the same 10-year period. By 2015, company
C’s waste output had risen to 10 tonnes, while the respective amounts of
waste from companies A and B had dropped to 8 tonnes and only 3
tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 56
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 67
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...companies in terms of their waste output between the years 2000 and 2015. It is...
^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nificant changes in the amounts of waste produced by all three companies shown on...
^^^
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nies shown on the graph. While companies A and B saw waste output fall over the 1...
^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l over the 15-year period, the amount of waste produced by company C increased co...
^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed 12 tonnes of waste, while companies B and C produced around 8 tonnes and 4 ton...
^^^
Line 8, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes of waste material respectively. Over the following 5 years...
^^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g 5 years, the waste output of companies B and C rose by around 2 tonnes, but the...
^^^
Line 10, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es, but the figure for company A fell by approximately 1 tonne. From 2005 to 20...
^^^
Line 12, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pany A cut waste production by roughly 3 tonnes, and company B reduced its waste ...
^^^
Line 13, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reduced its waste by around 7 tonnes. By contrast, company C saw an increase in w...
^^^
Line 14, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...C saw an increase in waste production of approximately 4 tonnes over the same 10-...
^^^
Line 15, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he same 10-year period. By 2015, company C’s waste output had risen to 10 tonnes,...
^^^
Line 16, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tonnes, while the respective amounts of waste from companies A and B had dropped...
^^^
Line 17, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and B had dropped to 8 tonnes and only 3 tonnes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76842105263 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73603226885 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484210526316 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.5320249846 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.25 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 17.0 3.83414634146 443% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457153320588 0.215688989381 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.246787252581 0.103423049105 239% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110319242021 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1642004442 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981651734747 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.