The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The graph illustrates about spending resulted rate by three offices between 2000 until 2015
Overall, all of the companies indicated fluctuation number every years. While companies A dan B showed the significant changed was decrease until the end, whereas company C saw stable increased until final period.
In 2000, company A and B produced 12 tones and almost 9 tones of waste respectively, while after 5 years company A indicated decresed steadily with the percentage around 9 and 12 tones and in 2015, this company only distributed almost 9 tones of waste. Whereas, in 2005 company B was increased upward 9 tones of waste, after this years until 2015 this company sustained degenerated with the produced of waste was 3 tones.
Furthermore, in the first years company C was became the lower office with distributed of waste around 3 until 6 tones, after 15 years later this company constantly rise with produced of waste about 9 and 12 tones per 2015, and this number proved company B was being the higher produced of waste than another company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is by reducing the maximum speed limits on vehicles others think there are other better ways Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills Do you agree or disagree 84
- World would be a better place if more women were in leadership positions To what extent you agree or disagree 73
- Society is based on rules and laws If individuals were free to do whatever they want to do it could not function To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 67
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph illustrates about spending resulted rate by three offices ...
^^
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...fices between 2000 until 2015 Overall, all of the companies indicated fluctuation number ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ibuted almost 9 tones of waste. Whereas, in 2005 company B was increased upward 9...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ncreased upward 9 tones of waste, after this years until 2015 this company sustained...
^^^^
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...rmore, in the first years company C was became the lower office with distributed of wa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94350282486 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63671777681 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8373754033 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.0 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.4 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287688004206 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161914781575 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487966263111 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167090649123 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583942300198 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.