The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The graph illustrates about spending resulted rate by three offices between 2000 until 2015
Overall, all of the companies indicated fluctuation number every years. While companies A dan B showed the significant changed was decrease until the end, whereas company C saw stable increased until final period.
In 2000, company A and B produced 12 tones and almost 9 tones of waste respectively, while after 5 years company A indicated decresed steadily with the percentage around 9 and 12 tones and in 2015, this company only distributed almost 9 tones of waste. Whereas, in 2005 company B was increased upward 9 tones of waste, after this years until 2015 this company sustained degenerated with the produced of waste was 3 tones.
Furthermore, in the first years company C was became the lower office with distributed of waste around 3 until 6 tones, after 15 years later this company constantly rise with produced of waste about 9 and 12 tones per 2015, and this number proved company B was being the higher produced of waste than another company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- Some people say that youngsters should take part time job while study in University Do you agree or disagree 56
- The Chart gives information on percentage of women going into higher education in five countries for the years 1980 and 2015
- The graph shows the number shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One should never judge a person by its external appearance Use specific details and reasons to support your answer 73
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph illustrates about spending resulted rate by three offices ...
^^
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...fices between 2000 until 2015 Overall, all of the companies indicated fluctuation number ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ibuted almost 9 tones of waste. Whereas, in 2005 company B was increased upward 9...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ncreased upward 9 tones of waste, after this years until 2015 this company sustained...
^^^^
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...rmore, in the first years company C was became the lower office with distributed of wa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94350282486 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63671777681 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508474576271 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8373754033 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.0 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.4 22.9334400587 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287688004206 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161914781575 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487966263111 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167090649123 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583942300198 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.