The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph represents the data on the changes in the number of individual CO2 emissions in metric tonnes during 4 decades (1967-2007) in 4 European countries.
Overall, there was an upward trend in 2 countries including Italy and Portugal whereas the United Kingdom and Sweden witnessed a downward one.
In 1967, the two countries that occupied the 2 lowest number were Italy and Portugal, which respectively recorded about 1 and 4 tonnes of the CO2 emissions per person. It is clear that the figure experienced a significant increase over the first 30 years, it rose by approximately 3 tonnes in both these countries in 1997. After 1997, unchanging trend was recorded in both Italy and Portugal, they reached a nadir at roughly 7 and 5.5 tonnes in 2007, respectively.
Regarding the downward trend of CO2 emissions, the United Kingdom and Sweden experienced a moderate decline during 4 decades. In 1967, they recorded the 2 highest figure for CO2 emissions, at about 11 and 9 tonnes, respectively. The figure for the United Kingdom was decreased during 40 years, by 2 tonnes from 1967 to 2007. Meanwhile, although Sweden had a remarkable increase between 1967 and 1977, the figure was still recorded a downward trend after 1977, at more than 5 tonnes in 2007.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, still, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97641509434 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85038001876 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1504117238 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.222222222 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180681642746 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841345383679 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435720220375 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116850492095 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129202810625 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.