These days, an intense rivalry between the elderly and the younger counterparts for jobs has aroused people’s discussion. It is said that aged people tend to face with jobless and strain because of young rivals’ competition. This essay will examine these impacts as well as necessary steps that should be taken to curb the problems.
There are two primary issues that the older generation has to deal with when competing with the young in the workplace. First and foremost (C1), as a result of age discrimination, older people often suffer more disadvantages when seeking the same positions as young candidates, even when they have similar abilities and qualifications. Consequently, a number of them become out of jobs, which may prevent them from meeting basic human needs. Secondly, elderly employees might undergo enormous strains, stemming from the fact that their young colleagues seem to be more creative and adapt themselves to changes at the workplace more effectively than they could do. This may lead to both physical and psychological problems, including heart disease and depression.
Since such issues are too complicated, both the government and individuals should take steps immediately to address these problems. The first essential step is that the administration should encourage enterprises to apply the Anti-age Discrimination Law in order to protect employees aged 40 years old or more from employment discrimination based on age. Therefore, they would be given better opportunities to find suitable jobs and acquire a livelihood. From an individual perspective, older workers should be willing to update their skills through attending training courses. If younger colleagues also help them to adapt to changes in the working environment, older workers will gain confidence and improve their work performance.
In conclusion, there can be no doubt that there are some intricate problems as a consequence of an increasing rivalry between the old and the young in the job market, and some holistic approaches should be adopted to curb these problems. This thorny issue can be resolved thoroughly only when concerted endeavors are made immediately by the government and individuals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43440233236 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01762650934 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600583090379 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0203585825 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.266666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13496557988 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444927473987 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388468062421 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835965117764 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235407232785 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.