The graph compares four different countries in terms of carbon dioxide emissions per capita over a 40-year timespan.
Overall, while the proportion of carbon footprints emitted in Portugal and Italy climbed markedly, the figure for emissions of individuals in the United Kingdom and Sweden dropped substantially.
A closer look at the graph reveals that the UK ranked the highest throughout the decades, but witnessed a modest decline. Carbon dioxide discharged into the atmosphere in 1967 was over 10 metric tonnes. After a decade, there was a gradual fall in the mean carbon footprints released, followed by a period of dropping until 2007, at roughly 9 metric tonnes. The median CO2 emissions per person in Sweden also had the same figure as the UK in 2007, about nearly 9 metric tonnes. The year 1977 experienced a slight change in the average CO2 generated, which went up to over 11 metric tonnes, then plunged to 5.5 metric tonnes in 2007.
Over these 40 years, the number of average emissions per capita between Portugal and Italy increased significantly. The figure for Italy had considerably jumped, starting from 4 metric tonnes in 1967 tonnes and doubling to 8 metric tonnes in four decades. From 1967 to 2007, the proportion of carbon footprints emission in Portugal rose drastically. In 1967, it was just over 1 metric tonne; however, the figure soared dramatically to 5,5 metric tonnes, similar to Sweden's.
- Some say parents whose children are breaking the law should be punished in some way To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not effective Education and job training should be used instead Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some say parents whose children are breaking the law should be punished in some way To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people argue that if children behave badly their parents should accept responsibility and also be punished for the behavior of their children Do you agree or disagree with the statement 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'footprints'' or 'footprint's'?
Suggestion: footprints'; footprint's
... 1967 to 2007, the proportion of carbon footprints emission in Portugal rose drastically. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12820512821 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72779488379 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8098658027 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.090909091 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341697792186 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134730410928 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830439847948 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208507494162 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202727059022 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.