Numerous firms indeed translate offices into productive hubs of communication and collaboration l. While there are certain downsides of wall-less workspaces, I would contend that the drawbacks are overshadowed by the benefits.
There are innumerable reasons why people might disapprove of barrierless office design. The first objection is that there would be no privacy in the workplace. Employees working in open-plan offices with no partitions on the desks, thereby being peeked at or leaked confidential information such as their social media accounts' password and their projects which are unrelated to the business's assignment. Were the staff’s confidentialities to be revealed, they would not be confident in themselves and their performance would be hampered. Another justification is that workers' auditory direction would be impacted by the open-plan working area. Employees would spell trouble with co-workers congregating and talking loudly nearby, compromising productivity and affecting how they focus attentively at work.
In spite of the downsides mentioned above, I believe that an open-plan arrangement is a positive approach. First and foremost, it would facilitate communication and collaboration among colleagues. It is an open-plan environment that permits employees to discuss and corporate on their task ideas. This would therefore share experiences, enhance work efficiency and promote camaraderie. Workers who are introverted, reserved, and cooped up in cubicles, thereby socializing with each other and breaking down their communication barriers. It should also be noted that working chores would be increased transparency. Were they to work in workspaces with no defined boundaries such as walls or barriers, they would complete their tasks productively as the managers supervise them strictly. Boosting effective employee supervision management, which would in turn improve work productivity and qualifications.
In sum, it seems to me that shared office space is advantageous in a variety of ways.
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
- It is argue that parents od children who break the rules should be punished in some ways as parents are reponsible for the children s actions To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below show family expenditure in the UK between 1980 and 2010 56
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Do you think it is a positive or negative development Why 80
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the united kingdom sweden italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'accounts'' or 'account's'?
Suggestion: accounts'; account's
... information such as their social media accounts password and their projects which are u...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, while, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93559322034 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3055175727 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3243367458 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111341422119 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416442397558 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384846776328 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806816580756 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040235365741 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'accounts'' or 'account's'?
Suggestion: accounts'; account's
... information such as their social media accounts password and their projects which are u...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, while, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93559322034 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3055175727 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3243367458 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111341422119 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416442397558 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384846776328 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806816580756 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040235365741 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.