The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The table gives information about carbon dioxide proportion per person in 4 different European countries from 1967 to 2007.
As can be seen from the graph that the CO2 emissions decreased slightly over the period in the UK and Sweden. While Italy and Portugal carbon dioxide emissions index per person increased gradually.
Looking at the for information in more detail, we can see that Portugal begun with just above 2 tones in 1967. Then there was a rapid increase in over the 40 years and it was 5 tones in 2007. Italy begun with 4.2 tones CO2 emission per person in 1967. There was a gradual increase in CO2 emission from 1967 to 1977 then it continued minimal growth for the next 20 year and it remained stable with 7.8 tones between 1997 and 2007. Sweden had significant increase from 1967 and 1977, however carbon emissions begun decreased sharply to the end of the period and it was 5.5 tones. Turning to UK it was 10.6 tones per person in 1967, and it decreased gradually over the period then it dipped with 8.2 metric tones.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was 5.5 tones. Turning to UK it was 10.6 tones per person in 1967, and it decreas...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60540540541 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31207330772 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518918918919 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0765297022 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262181446132 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136804851526 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775664233671 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21540864348 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362537428544 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.