the graph below shows average carbon dioxide (co2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. summaries the information by selecting and the reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar graph compares how much tones co2 emissions per person in given four countries namely United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal year between 1967 to 2007.
It is clear from the figures that, United kingdom had highest c02 emission above 10 tones in year 1967 and the figure was slightly decreased 1977 to 2007, and reached above 8 tones in 2007. Beside that, Italy had lowest co2 emission 4 tones only in 1967 but the figure were increased drastically and reached below 8 tones in 1997. However Sweden and Portugal showed same co2 emission below 5 tones in year 2007.
Moreover Portugal was lowest in co2 emission country among all countries, Lastly Sweden was drastically rose up by above 10 tones in year 1977 but the figure was slightly dropped and reached to same figure as Portugal 6 tones in year 2007.
To conclude , As can be seen from all given four countries figures in co2 emissions, Italy and United Kingdom both countries were around 8 tones co2 emission in year 2007.
- The advantage of the spread of English as a global language will continue to outweigh its disadvantages.do u agree or disagree with this? 73
- The natural resources such as oil forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate what problems does it cause how can we save these problems 69
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 78
- Full time university students spend most of the time in studying They should do other activities too To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided Into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The given bar graph compares how much tones co2 emissions per person in given...
^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he figure was slightly decreased 1977 to 2007, and reached above 8 tones in 2007....
^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ally and reached below 8 tones in 1997. However Sweden and Portugal showed same co2 emi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...mission below 5 tones in year 2007. Moreover Portugal was lowest in co2 emission cou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...ountries, Lastly Sweden was drastically rose up by above 10 tones in year 1977 but t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gal 6 tones in year 2007. To conclude , As can be seen from all given four coun...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'lastly', 'moreover', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.281914893617 0.268076937826 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.127659574468 0.116061578633 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0744680851064 0.0759168565197 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0478723404255 0.0366838410393 130% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00531914893617 0.0131127313244 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13829787234 0.155750635184 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0372340425532 0.0379272487307 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.25271899205 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0212765957447 0.0210936926555 101% => OK
Particles: 0.00531914893617 0.00175180941692 304% => OK
Determiners: 0.0478723404255 0.0948980150116 50% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00531914893617 0.00437022459523 122% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00531914893617 0.00967000014798 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1004.0 1161.00487805 86% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.9 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73714285714 5.90752243213 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73763899035 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.314285714286 0.337110787985 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.217142857143 0.247514529752 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.142857142857 0.171178102325 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0571428571429 0.112407865282 51% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25271899205 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474285714286 0.546246751206 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 38.2843577892 49.3433353143 78% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 29.1666666667 23.0094962315 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3094768711 42.9750493124 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.333333333 135.714022679 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1666666667 23.0094962315 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.689975730869 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.48048780488 405% => OK
Readability: 50.880952381 47.7609492067 107% => OK
Elegance: 2.52941176471 2.94281807926 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361251301975 0.418131533498 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.277814805314 0.181151798455 153% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0481873652888 0.0850326197045 57% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.855817062838 0.706616315825 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158608225631 0.157042692854 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.243876118606 0.228904883108 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729693566546 0.108899403657 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.392727921568 0.367819155151 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.121709744207 0.0812612215331 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264751268175 0.316326947829 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937159528086 0.0921553760075 102% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.