The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the Uninated Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph compares the changes in the emissions of carbon dioxide per person in different places in European in period from 1967 to 2007.
In general terms, the amount of carbon dioxide in portugal and Italy increased steadly from 1967 to 2007. In contrast, the emissions of carbon dioxide in United Kingdom and Sweden was decrease during that period of the time.
It is clear from the line graph show that In 1967, the emissions of carbon dioxide in italy was approximately 4,2 metric tonnes and in 2007, the emissions achieved about 7,8 metric tonnes. In Portugal, in the begining of the period was a bit higher than 1 metric tonnes. However, it rose dramatically nearly 5,4 metric tonnes in 2007.
On the other hand, the emissions of carbon dioxide in UK in 1967 was the highest than other countries ( 711 metric tonnes). But after 1967, it declined significanlty to about 9 metric tonnes. The emissions in Sweden was nearly 8,6 metric tonnes in the begining, then it increased steadly around 10,5 metric tonnesin 1977. However, it dropped dramatically from about 10,5 metric tonnes to 5,4 metric tonnes between 1997 and 2007. As can been seen that, the emissions in Sweden same level with Portugal ( approximately 5,4 metric tonnes).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-29 | trangh16688 | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who choose certain university subjects in 2005. 73
- Describe the information in the table and make comparisons where appropriate. 11
- The Internet has many disadvantages as it does advantagesTo what extent do you agree with this statement? 67
- Children should always follow their parents parents advice To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 79
- Women and men are commonly seen as having differet strenght and weaknesses. it is right to exclude males or females from certain professuins because of their gender? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...967 was the highest than other countries 711 metric tonnes. But after 1967, it de...
^^
Line 4, column 430, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
...metric tonnes between 1997 and 2007. As can been seen that, the emissions in Sweden same...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sions in Sweden same level with Portugal approximately 5,4 metric tonnes.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90476190476 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47730744039 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442857142857 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8426109225 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6363636364 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311441902984 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138190763328 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103895858477 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244741090004 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794236934026 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.