The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The supplied graph depicts amount of exhaled CO2 emissions in metric tones per person in four European countries from 1967 to 2007. It is obvious from given graph, that Portugal and Italy showed raising trend over the period, when UK and Sweden represented opposite trend. However, in 2007 all countries reached almost same numbers.

Italy and Portugal showed over the period similar increasing trend with just below 2 tonnes and slightly above 4 tonnes respectively. In the last decade CO2 pollutions In Italy and Portugal remained steady (about 5 tonnes and roughly 7 tonnes).

Getting back to the data, CO2 emissions continuosly dropped down, but, in 1977 Sweden polluted air as much as UK, about 11 tonnes per person. Therefore, in 1977 numbers peaked in Sweden, in next decade is visible significant dip to just above 6 tonnes. Since 1987, UK and Sweden continued decreasing of CO2 emissions, ending with approximately 9 and about 5 tonnes respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14649681529 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6612620526 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2484529229 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219175909633 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929798750718 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513743469936 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146885420132 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448920746495 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.