The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph represents the information about carbon dioxide emitted from person in four different countries from 1967 to 2007. The types of countries are divided into the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal. Overall, it is clear from the chart the United Kingdom was the highest figure throughout the period while Sweden was the lowest figure in the last period.

It is apparent that the the emission of carbon dioxide per person in Italy was doubled from 4 metric tons in 1967 to approximately 8 metric tons in 2007. In addition, in Portugal, carbon dioxide emission was significantly jumped to roughly 5 metric tons in 2017, from initially around 1 metric ton in 1967.

In contrast, the United Kingdom and Sweden figures sort of the same trend. Carbon dioxide emissions from both countries decreased dramatic to just under 10 and 6 in 2007, respectively. However, emission of carbon dioxide in Sweden was go up to the peak in 1997, before this figure slightly declined.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...the last period. It is apparent that the the emission of carbon dioxide per person i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...the last period. It is apparent that the the emission of carbon dioxide per person i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...mission of carbon dioxide in Sweden was go up to the peak in 1997, before this fig...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in addition, in contrast, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57817249925 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1879684117 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234648330424 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11517449417 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496002265798 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164470144947 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00441368383478 0.0819641961636 5% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.