The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

the given graph depicts the changes in the amounts of carbon dioxide, produced per person, in four European countries (UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) during a 40-year period, starting from 1967.

Overall, the British produced the most carbon dioxide, Portuguese, on the other hand, emitted the least.Moreover, the trend for producing carbon dioxide was decremented in in Britain and Sweden, whereas it was incremental in Italy and Portugal within the given period.

At the beginning of the period, 1967, the production of carbon dioxide per person in Britain was far higher than the three other countries (around 11 metric tonnes). Subsequently, it decreased gradually to just over 8 metric tonnes by 2007. Sweden was another country in which, carbon dioxide emission with 8 metric tonnes in 1967, experienced a downward trend, after a short-term sharp growth, and hit a bottom of 5 metric tonnes.

By contrast, the trend for emitting carbon dioxide was incremental in Italy and Portugal. In Italy, carbon dioxide emission grew significantly from around 4 to over 6 metric tonnes till 1979. It then rose slightly until overtook that of Sweden in 1987
and finally, reached a pick of approximately 8 metric tones by 2007. Similarly, in Portugal, reseal of carbon dioxide rose moderately from 1 metric tonnes in 1967 and then met that of Sweden at about 4 metric tonnes by 2007.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the given graph depicts the changes in the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ritish produced the most carbon dioxide, Portuguese, on the other hand, emitted t...
^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...e, on the other hand, emitted the least.Moreover, the trend for producing carbon dioxide...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...roducing carbon dioxide was decremented in in Britain and Sweden, whereas it was incr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the beginning of the period, 1967, the production of carbon dioxide per person ...
^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of carbon dioxide per person in Britain was far higher than the three other coun...
^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tonnes till 1979. It then rose slightly until overtook that of Sweden in 1987 a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, whereas, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12389380531 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72088996971 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522123893805 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8595575083 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211348310641 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999652951597 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395310361355 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132969506679 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282949710629 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.