The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph below shows the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per person in united Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. The line graph given is measured by metric tonnes.

By clearly observing the graph, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per person in Italy and Portugal was increased, while compared to that of United Kingdom and Sweden.

With regards, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per person in Italy was doubled from 4 metric tonnes in 1967 to almost 8 metric tonnes in 207. Similarly, the emission in Portugal also increased from 1 metric tonnes in 1967 to nearly 6 metric tonnes in 2007.

On the other hand, United Kingdom decreased there average emission of Carbon dioxide per person from 11 metric tonnes in 1967 to 7 metric tonnes in 2007. Although, there was a little increase of emission of carbon dioxide in 1977, the overall amount of carbon dioxide emitted per person in Sweden decreased from 8.5 metric tonnes to 6 metric tonnes from 1967 to 2007.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in graph is measured by metric tonnes. By clearly observing the graph, the a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased in United Kingdom and Sweden. With regards to the volume of the amount...
^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1967 to nearly 6 metric tonnes in 2007. On the other hand, United decreased ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81182795699 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19981841608 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.381720430108 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9977600185 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320823282903 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228681348156 0.103423049105 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110011859016 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262609800063 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958443689751 0.0819641961636 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.