The given graph decribes the CO2 amount emitted by each person in four different countries from 1967 to 2007.
In 1967, British and Swedish were people who created most CO2 emissions; About 11 tonnes in UK, the highest point in the chart and 9 tonnes in Sweden; Particularly sweden then increased to around 10 tonnes in 1997 while UK still held the old figure in the same year. However, both CO2 production of two countries continously fell down during remaining years of period of the chart; just about 8 tonnes in UK in 2007, this figure in sweden was 5 tonnes and the least in four countries at the same year.
In contrast,Quantity of CO2 produced by each Italian or portuguese was less than two above countries in 1967; 5 tonnes in Italian, Portugal was only around 1 tonnes, the lowest point of the chart. But these figures rose up significantly in both two countries in three next decades, and reached the maximums in 1997 with nearly 8 tonnes in Italia, 5 tonnes in Portugal and were stable at these levels until 2007.
In conclusion, UK and Sweden tended to reduce CO2, in the meanwhile, there was a tendency to increase over the period shown in the chart.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 69
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Quantity
...untries at the same year. In contrast,Quantity of CO2 produced by each Italian or port...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, then, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64423076923 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56121431883 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2391822292 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.0 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6666666667 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109235685577 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067533661811 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366442397777 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082445376453 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378518987808 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.