the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Portugal, and Italy between 1967 and 2007.
A breakdown of changes in the rates of the emissions of carbon dioxide per person in four different countries from 1967 to 2007 is depicted by the line graph. Overall, Italy and Portugal enjoyed an upward trend, since the others decreased.
Initially, from 1967 to 1977, the carbon dioxide emissions in Sweden, Italy, and Portugal increased moderately by around 2 metric tonnes, while United Kingdom plunged slightly to around 11 metric tonnes. In the next following decade, Italy and Portugal improved moderately to 2 metric tonnes, whereas Sweden dropped dramatically to nearly 7 metric tonnes of emissions. Similarly, British saw a slight decline.
It is clear that in the 2 following decades, Italy and Portugal grew markedly to around 8 metric tonnes and just under 6 metric tonnes, respectively. Additionally, Italy was able to surpass the number of carbon dioxide emissions in Sweden in the end of period. However, England had successfully decreased the emissions but still placed in the first rank, with 9 metric tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-01 | Timbadiya krish | view | |
| 2021-07-01 | Timbadiya krish | 100 | view |
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The table below shows the estimated literacy rates by region and gender for 2000 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eriod. However, England had successfully decreased the emissions but still placed...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the first rank, with 9 metric tonnes.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, similarly, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24698795181 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7541981574 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596385542169 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4458460552 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260621443453 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109782527956 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105152387223 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186423594668 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059976036094 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.