The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.

Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The presented graph provides data of information about CO2 mid-value spreading individuality in different Europe nations from 1967 to 2007. Generally, the amount of CO2 distributed in UK decreased gradually while Portugal experienced a rise of carbon dioxide progressively in these years.

Although United Kingdom hold the most CO2 gas in 1967 which contain 11 metric tonnes per head, the rate of gas emission curbed gradually to the extend that achieved to 8 metric tonnes per person after 40 years. In addition, the amount CO2 spreading in Italy was 9 metric tonnes per head in the 60th. However this countries are involved some fluctuations CO2 emission amount 20 years later, the volume of downward trend continued moderately and achieved at 5 metric tonnes in 2007. A grow CO2 emission has been witnessed during these 4 decades which started from 4 metric tonnes in 1967 and ended at 7.5 metric tonnes per head in 2007. Portugal also experienced a rise of CO2 between 1967 and 2007. Although amount of Carbon Dioxide measured 1metric tonnes was the lowest balanced between these countries in 1967, volume has reached 3 metric tonnes per person during these forty years.

In summerise, although the amount of CO2 released in the UK has been declined over the year, it remained the largest producer of CO2 in this period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-05 Ipman_v 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ate of gas emission curbed gradually to the extend that achieved to 8 metric tonnes per pe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[2]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...of gas emission curbed gradually to the extend that achieved to 8 metric tonnes per pe...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s 9 metric tonnes per head in the 60th. However this countries are involved some fluctu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ic tonnes per head in the 60th. However this countries are involved some fluctuation...
^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd achieved at 5 metric tonnes in 2007. A grow CO2 emission has been witnessed during...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tric tonnes in 2007. A grow CO2 emission has been witnessed during these 4 decade...
^^
Line 5, column 742, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...though amount of Carbon Dioxide measured 1metric tonnes was the lowest balanced b...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0407239819 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60260857309 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511312217195 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0625257202 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.777777778 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172979170391 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876822974889 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464745012447 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979760202597 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706447853126 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.