The information about the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007 is depicted by the rendered bar chart. The data has been calibrated in metric tonnes.
To begin with, the lowest carbon dioxide emissions per person was shown in 1967 in Portugal, which was 1 metric tonne. However, a drastic increase was seen in CO2 emissions between 1967 and 2007. 4 metric tonnes were noticed in Italy in 1967. After that, there was a dramatic increase seen until 1977, it accounted for just above 6. From 1977 to 2007, in this country, the number of carbon emissions per person increased, it was just under 8.
Moving towards, 9 and 11 metric tonnes of CO2 emissions were noticed in 1967 in Sweden and the United Kingdom respectively. There had been drastic decrease was seen in the average of carbon dioxide emissions individually in the UK over a given period. Although in Sweden, it was increased until 1977 by 3 but after that, it was decreased dramatically, it comprised for 9.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the same number of metric tones CO2 emissions per person in Sweden and Portugal throughout the span.
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 67
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sport facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give you 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81067961165 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54128415899 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52427184466 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9667100811 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0909090909 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297310644001 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127009012868 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113936326531 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211615507796 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950681083709 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.