The information about the selling of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five different nations is depicted by the rendered two tables. The data has been calibrated in millions of euros.
To begin with, in 1999, 1.5 and 3 million euros sales of coffee were in the UK and Switzerland. However, there had been drastic increase noticed in 2004 for these countries, it was increased by 18.5 and 3 correspondingly. Moreover, in Denmark and Sweden, there were 0.2 million euros of the positive difference between 1999 and 2004. 1 million euros trading of coffee were in Belgium, in 1999. After 5 years, it was rose by 0.7.
Moving towards, a dramatic increase was seen in the vending of bananas in Switzerland in 2004, it comprised to 47 million of euros. Sweden and Denmark is the only nation where the trades of bananas were declined, which were decreased by 0.8 and 0.1 respectively. Whereas, there was a rapid increase observed in the sales of bananas in the UK and Belgium, which were 5.5 and 4 in 2004 respectively.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the sales of coffee were increased in all five European countries throughout the span.
- the diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of the telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 67
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some people believe that unpaid community service be a compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, whereas, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81280788177 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88676675723 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532019704433 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5881128237 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288737483967 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119660158702 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111933303602 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196329488557 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908194793376 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.