The line graph compares the per capita carbon dioxide emissions released in four different countries during four decades.
Overall, it is apparent that the average amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person in Britain continuously dominated among the four nations, while the equivalent figure for Portugal ranked the lowest over the period shown. Besides, the number of emissions in Sweden and Italy saw a clear upward trend, compared with that of the other two countries.=
In 1967, Portuguese people released the fewest amount of carbon dioxide, with a figure of about 1 metric tonne. In the following 40 years, the quantity of carbon dioxide emissions increased remarkably, peaking at approximately 5 metric tonnes in 2007. Similarly, an obvious increment can also be seen in the amount of this type of greenhouse gas emissions in Italy, almost doubling from 4 in 1967 to roughly 8 metric tonnes in 2007.
By contrast, there was a downward trend in the UK, as the number of emissions declined from about 11 to less than 9 metric tonnes throughout this period of time. Interestingly, in spite of the fluctuation of around 3 metric tonnes between 1967 and 1987, the figure for carbon dioxide emissions per person had decreased since then , falling to about 7 metric tonnes in 2007.
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden Portugal between 1967 and 2007 56
- the table below gives information about consumers spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ss than 9 metric tonnes throughout this period of time. Interestingly, in spite of the fluctua...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ions per person had decreased since then , falling to about 7 metric tonnes in 200...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, similarly, so, then, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04694835681 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68519245825 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.4723906192 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.571428571 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223162146695 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108429233727 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477910570709 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140169991661 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236824794439 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.