The line graph illustrates shifts in the number of tonnes of CO2 released per person each year in four nations from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, while the United Kingdom and Sweden's populations tend to emit less and less carbon dioxide, Italy and Portugal saw an opposite trend. In addition, the figure for this phenomenon is highest in the UK throughout the year
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 1967, approximately 11 metric tonnes of CO2 per person were witnessed in the UK, followed by Sweden, at 8,5 tonnes. The quantity of tonnes in Italy and Portugal was 4 tonnes and more than 1 tonne respectively. There was a sharp decrease in the average CO2 emissions per person in the UK to 9 tonnes in 2007.
The rest of the nations grew dramatically in the year 1977. Sweden jumped enormously from 8,5 tonnes to more than 10 tonnes during ten years but later fell significantly to around 5 tonnes in 2007. There was a rapid growth to nearly 8 tonnes in average CO2 emissions per people in Italy, surpassing Sweden at the later of the year 1987. Finally, Portugal increased considerably to 5,5 tonnes in 2007.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 84
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period
- The table below shows the prices of a cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed line phones from 1994 to 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is highest in the UK throughout the year Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 1...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68367346939 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63124863663 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6471886821 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188162832824 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912570113168 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528293430949 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124500403884 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182700467558 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.