The line graph illustrates the number of people who travel by car, bus and train each day in the UK from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, more people use car than bus and train in the period. The figure for car and train users increased considerably and will continue to rise, while there was a gradual decline in the number of bus commuters.
In 1970, the number of people who commute by car, bus and train were roughly 5 millions, 4 millions and 2 millions, respectively. From 1970, there was a significant rise in the figure for car users, at about 7 millions in 2012. The number of people who commute by train also increased rapidly, whereas there was a steady reduction in the number of bus users, at around 3.2 millions in 2012. The figure will be nearly 5 millions in 2030.
In the period between 2012 and 2030, the number of car commuters will continue to rise dramatically, reach a peak of 9 millions in 2030. The year 2030 will witness a sharp growth to nearly 5 millions in the figure for people who use train , whereas there will be a steady reduction in the number of people using bus, at below 3 millions in 2030.
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 73
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 89
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart shows information about fiction book sales from 2006 to 2010 73
- The line graph shows the channel one news viewing figures per day on one year 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s in the figure for people who use train , whereas there will be a steady reductio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44444444444 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43198910481 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425120772947 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3591478902 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380881545918 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189833879249 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131558800154 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290901666415 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137136925834 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.