The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.
The graph represents the amount of three different types of foods, namely; meat, salt and fish, consumed in China from 1985 to 2010.Overall, the fish consumption was popular throughout the period given. It is interesting to note that, both fish and meat consumption increased while salt consumption decreased substantially.
From 1985 to 1995, the consumption for fish remained at 600 grams even though there was a periodic fluctuation. Meat was the lowest consumption in China of 100 grams in 1985 before it stably increased to 200 grams (nearly) by 1995, whereas salt experienced a declining trend from 500 grams in 1985 to around 350 grams in 1995.
The amount of consumption for fish continued to rise remarkably to reach at close to 900 grams in 2010, whilst the salt decreased continuously with its consumption to end at 200 grams which figure is the same as meat's consumed amount in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Kien Vu | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | windingsilverfish | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | ochirvaani | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Vadim | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | Vadim | 61 | view |
- United intergovernmental panel on climate change report that climactic changes in northern hemisphere will cause drastick change in sea current and will raise the sea level. 84
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology for outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 73
- The given line chart illustrates the number of people changed between birth and death in Scotland over period 80 years between 1940 and 2020 67
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...sh, consumed in China from 1985 to 2010.Overall, the fish consumption was popular throu...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'whereas', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.213414634146 0.268076937826 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.146341463415 0.116061578633 126% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0548780487805 0.0759168565197 72% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0487804878049 0.0366838410393 133% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0182926829268 0.0131127313244 140% => OK
Prepositions: 0.170731707317 0.155750635184 110% => OK
Participles: 0.030487804878 0.0379272487307 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86539506681 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0548780487805 0.0210936926555 260% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0731707317073 0.0948980150116 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00609756097561 0.00967000014798 63% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 893.0 1161.00487805 77% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.9 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95333333333 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73763899035 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.293333333333 0.337110787985 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.2 0.247514529752 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18 0.171178102325 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.153333333333 0.112407865282 136% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86539506681 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.546246751206 103% => OK
Word variations: 45.7601665486 49.3433353143 93% => OK
How many sentences: 5.0 8.93414634146 56% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0094962315 130% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3052578619 42.9750493124 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.6 135.714022679 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 23.0094962315 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.689975730869 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 50.0 47.7609492067 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.94285714286 2.94281807926 66% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295656911624 0.418131533498 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.206844636773 0.181151798455 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0897199378998 0.0850326197045 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.782203006593 0.706616315825 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167620428873 0.157042692854 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183464161924 0.228904883108 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774134155415 0.108899403657 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.341987882922 0.367819155151 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0276413468914 0.0812612215331 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227482424684 0.316326947829 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439467863238 0.0921553760075 48% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 7.1512195122 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.