The graph below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of households owned cars in a particular European nation from 1971 to 2001.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that more and more households had cars, which mean that the number of families without cars decreased. Additionally, car ownership in this country rose over the period shown.
In 1971, almost half of the residents in this area did not possess a car, while about 35% of households owned 1 car and around 16% of families controlled 2 or more cars. Ten years later, the figures for those with no car or 1 car dropped to about 41% and approximately 30% respectively. Meanwhile, the quantity of houses having 2 or more motorcars nearly doubled compared to the original, at roughly 27%.
Over the one decade ensuing, there was a spike in the percentage of citizens kept 1 car, peaking at over 45%, whilst the remaining both data fell. In 2001, the figure for people who possessed no car, or 2 or more cars, was almost equal, at just under 30%, while the amount of households hold 1 car dipped slightly to around 44%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-02 | naalasadan | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-05 | TDuong994 | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-15 | quynhtran8 | view | |
| 2021-03-26 | nagakhoa | view |
- Many people say that universities should only offer places to young students with the highest marks while others say they should accept people of all ages even if they did not do well at school Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places What are the advantages and disadvantages both situations 73
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000. 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68421052632 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65476105002 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621052631579 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0444776022 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257422942759 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109703595874 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582154727514 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163479725089 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384246726231 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.