It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
Many animal species extinct due to a natural procedure. Some people believe that there are no compelling reasons for us to protect creature species on the verge of extinction from mother nature. In my perspective, the disappearance of wildlife is now not only due to natural disasters but also by human activities. From that, I think that people should practice many methods to stop this issue.
Firstly, it is true that only when a dreadful environmental disaster happened could a species be put at risk of extinction. Millions of years ago, many ancient species of animals such as dinosaurs were wiped out by active volcanoes release large amounts of sulfur and carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, according to some hypotheses. However, the extinction of wild animals is no longer a natural process but caused by humans. Industrial activities have been devastating the natural habitats of faunas and disturbing the food chain, causing the mass extinction of countless species. Furthermore, the increased demand for goods made from animals' products, such as skins or horns, also leads to the rampant poaching of wild, endangered animals, rhinos for instance. Therefore, humans are responsible and should do what is needed to rectify this situation.
I strongly believe is that it is a must to make efforts to prevent animals from dying out, especially wildlife in the IUCN Red List. Firstly, illegal hunting is a man-made problem which is on the rise around the globe, specifically in third-world countries. So, governments of those nations should tighten laws related to illegal hunting and wild animals trade. In addition, there is also a need for international cooperation in dealing with these evils like the establishment of an Alliance against wildlife trafficking in 2005 by the U.S department of state. Secondly, building a lot of protected areas, national parks, ecological gardens not only to protect the lives of the leftover animals in the world but also limit hunting and exploitation.
In conclusion, without aggressive global interventions, many animal species will disappear permanently. This would cause an imbalance in the ecosystem that influence negatively on human life and other animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-05 | docotrieu86@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-15 | docotrieu86@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | dantesw | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | ndiep | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- The chart below show the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000 and 2010 with projected sales for 2020 84
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 73
- The maps below show information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 79
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
.... I strongly believe is that it is a must to make efforts to prevent animals from dy...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...t wildlife trafficking in 2005 by the U.S department of state. Secondly, building...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32478632479 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93634217012 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6516427557 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.941176471 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58823529412 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295104894227 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877796777828 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661074091931 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165673358513 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927090716673 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.