The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of unemployers in England over 9 years from 1993 to 2012.
Overall, in all England, the unemployment percentages of young ages fell drastically, whilst; there was an increase in that of people aged 16 to 24. Particularly,the joblessness rates among young adults in London, which experienced the fastest growth, were little bit higher than in other regions of England by comparision.
In 1993, around 15% of people were out of work in London and the other England’s states. That figure was lower than the unemployment statistics of 16-24 age group, which accounted for about 20% in both the capital and the rest of England.
The general proportion of jobless people in all areas in England fell substaintially to less than 10% in 2012 after fluctuating slightly for 8 years. Following different patterns, there’s a considerable fluctuation in the rates of 16-24 years old people who were jobless in London and the other places of England before those figures peaking and 30% and 20% in respect.
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 78
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012. 84
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- . 78
- People in many countries have to spend more and more time away from their home. Why is this? What are the effects on people themselves and their families? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...at of people aged 16 to 24. Particularly,the joblessness rates among young adults i...
^^^^
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the joblessness rates among young adults in London, which experienced the fastest...
^^
Line 2, column 258, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ch experienced the fastest growth, were little bit higher than in other regions of England...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19298245614 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03903449342 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.287938645 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.285714285714 5.23603664747 5% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238182403412 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119716704181 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710146567059 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16715371462 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743686293011 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.