The line graph compares and contrasts the data on the changes in unemployment levels among 16 to 24-year-old and overall unemployment figures in the period of 10 years in England.
It is clear that the percentage of young adults who were unemployed saw an upward trend in the whole country, whereas the overall adults unemployment rate experienced a downward trend.
Clearly, the proportion of British people at the age of 16 to 24 without work were higher than the overall adults unemployment rate. To specify, in 1993, about 25% of British 16 to 24-year-old living in London were unemployed, which was 5% higher than that for those living outside London. The figures fell markedly between 1993 and 2002 before seeing dramatically growth over the following 10 years to 25% and over 21% in the rates in the capital and in the rest of England, respectively.
Besides, the overall adult unemployment rate in London was always higher than that in the rest of England. In detail, the proportion of all adult without work living in the capital was 14%, while the figure for those living outside London was just 10%. The rates for both groups of adults declined significantly during the first twelve years. Especially after that, these figures grew gradually, but still under 10% in the end of the given time.
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 73
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 78
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 87
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
... the whole country, whereas the overall adults unemployment rate experienced a downwar...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
...thout work were higher than the overall adults unemployment rate. To specify, in 1993,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64675327935 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0738335731 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262117382114 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1105016663 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726858308606 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165399899233 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275539999035 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.