The graph provides information about the transformation trends of using modern technology tools in homes in the UK from 1994 to 2008.
Overall, there were no different patterns in using the four kinds of modern technology devices (e.g. CD player, mobile phone, internet connection, and DVD player) for about 10 years from 1994 to 2004 in homes in the UK. In those periods, CD player was the most preference on computer devices of people in the UK, starting from 45% in 1994, move up gradually to more than 80% in 2005. The second and the third preference of people in those years were mobile phone and internet connection.
By contrast, the trends had changed in 2005 when DVD player became the second choice of people. The percentage of using DVD player in homes in the UK rose extremely from 30% in 2002 to 80% in 2005. Surprisingly in 2008 it climb up steadily to 90%, and became the first computer tools preference of people.
It is noticeable that the percentage of accessing the modern technology in 2008 increased on all devices, except CD player.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You 56
- maps Cambridge 12 test 6 task 1 11
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK expresses in percentage terms Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'climbs'?
Suggestion: climbs
...to 80% in 2005. Surprisingly in 2008 it climb up steadily to 90%, and became the firs...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., first, if, second, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77173913043 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60658882316 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7935239441 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150274080457 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740573307195 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670721514312 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117781608839 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535787729401 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.