the graph below shows concerns three productions in the forest industry in a European country. The production is timber, pulp, and paper increasing during the years between 1980 to 2000.
The line chart illustrates the number changed in three cohort, namely pulp, paper and timber, in a particular European nation from 1980 to 2000. The number of pulp presented steadily increased while the trends for paper and timber showed some fluctuations though both of them increased in different range.
In the year 1980, the pulp industry was the most productive industry, came top with around 5 million tones which followed by paper and timber with about 4.2 million tones and they mainly shared the same number. In the next coming years, the figure for pulp industry constantly increased and even share the same speed with one in parer in the second five years. At last, it ended up with 9 million tones which still the most among three cohorts.
When it comes to the timber industry, it is noticeable that the figure remarkably rose and exceeded other two counterparts in 1985, and then finally peaked at 10 million tones in 1990, after which it plummeted and became the minority in 2000. As for the data for paper, it continued to climbed though it mainly kept stable between 1990 to 1995 and increased again in the last five years, nearly reached 8 million tones.
Simply put, the production of these three industry have both experienced different range of increase.
- the diagrams below show the process of applying for a driver license in America 78
- the graph shows the percentage of people using the internet for different activities in a UK city between 2003 to 2006. 61
- The bar chart below shows the main reasons for students choosing to study at a particular university in the UK in 1985 and 2005 52
- the table described the changed of people who went for international travel in 1990, 2000 and 2005. 78
- the graph below shows concerns three productions in the forest industry in a European country The production is timber pulp and paper increasing during the years between 1980 to 2000 51
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cohort' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cohorts'.
Suggestion: cohorts
...illustrates the number changed in three cohort, namely pulp, paper and timber, in a pa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, still, then, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86697247706 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3514398614 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596330275229 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0393655648 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.625 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276109735678 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116782508203 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663292524614 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161332484321 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660907077305 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.