The line graph illustrates the amount of four different kinds of meat namely chicken, beef, lamb, and fish that a citizen of a European country consumed weekly from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it is evident that while the consumption of chicken increased, the opposite was true for the intake of beef and lamb. Also, fish remained the least popular meat during this period.
In 1979, beef was the most favored meat at over 200 grams per person per week. Chicken and lamb were eaten in similar quantities at around 150 grams. It can also be seen that the intake of fish is only one third that of chicken or lamb.
Between 1979 and 2004, the country witnessed a massive change as chicken consumption rose continuously and hit its peak of around 250 grams per person per week. The contrast can be observed for beef and lamb as the amount eaten for both kinds of meat dropped more than half. Similarly, fewer fish was eaten in the country, with its figure declining by about 15 grams per week.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: elirya
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58757062147 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21670610346 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587570621469 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.926179108 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183920013112 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799371281037 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615467651195 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129501318115 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586345166843 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.