The line chart elucidates the expenditure of fish and three categories of meat in a European nation among 1979 and 2004.
Overall, the consumption of chicken had witnessed a noticeable climb, however, the tendency of the expenditure of fish, beef, lamp was negatively correlated.
As a deep analysis of the chart disclosure, it is explicitly observed that from 1979 to 1994 after the number of chicken consumed follow by a growth pattern that was more varied from 150 to 200, after that it had an appreciable accelebration and reached the highest point of 250 in the year 2004.
Turning into more detail, it is lucid that the opposite was seen in the quantity of beef, fish, lamb devoured, the trend of three kinds of meat saw a modest decline from 1979 to 2004. The figure of beef ingested experienced a slight lull on the first decade since 1979 then a dramatical drop was recorded among the 1989 and 2004. The amout of lamp consumed underwent a mild decrease from 150 to 100 in the year 1989 before plunging to over 50 in 2004. The expenditure of fish was a similarly fashion in fish and beef, it was a minimal drop from over 50 to under 50 between 1979 and 2004.
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 20
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Link table https drive google com file d 1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne RNQC5d M view
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 452, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...989 before plunging to over 50 in 2004. The expenditure of fish was a similarly fas...
^^^
Line 4, column 480, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('similarly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fashion') instead of another adjective.
...50 in 2004. The expenditure of fish was a similarly fashion in fish and beef, it was a minimal drop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, similarly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57142857143 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58578005704 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509523809524 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0831831271 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.142857143 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1544761082 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816667011297 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397940621049 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967057165252 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474476652909 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.