The line chart elucidates the expenditure of three categories of fast food by Australian adolescence
Overall, the number of time eaten pizza and hambugers had witnessed a sharp climb, however, the tendency of the figure of time eaten fish and ships was negatively correlated.
As a deep analysis of the chart disclosure, it is explicitly observed that a dramtical climb in pizza's consumption was recorded 2 times from under 20 to over 80 on the decade and jumped further to over 100 from the year 1985 to 2000. Turning into more details, there was am enlargement in the propensity of the hambuger's expenditure , after seeing a steady surge from under 20 to over 80 between the 1975 to 1995, it underwent a modest growth of near 90 at the year 2000.
Giving a shutfy on this period, the reverse was true for the amout of fish and ships eaten, after being subject to overall volatility, it decreased sharply from over 80 to under 40, between the year 1985 and 2000
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The bar chart below shows the number of men and women studying engineering at Australian universities 10
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 74
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Schools should teach children some academic subjects which will be beneficial to their future careers Therefore other subjects such as music and sports are not important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... propensity of the hambugers expenditure , after seeing a steady surge from under ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68235294118 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64496918217 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605882352941 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 22.4926829268 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.1138486627 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 199.0 112.824112599 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.5 22.9334400587 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0809184444083 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462889053351 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579901276922 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759937933697 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116784932267 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.9 13.2329268293 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.77 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.9970731707 171% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.