The line graph compares the consumption of various meats in Europe during 1979 and 2004. Looking more closely to the table, it can be seen there is a downward trend for all kind of meat, except an upward trend is seen in Chicken consumption.
According to the graph, Beef were the most popular food at over 200 grams per week in 1979. After that, there was a fluctuation of eating beef for 10 years. After that, beef consumption declined dramatically from 200 grams in 1990 to 100 grams in 2004. On the contrary, Chicken were the third on 1979. But it increased gradually for 25-year period to 250 grams. Furthermore, Lamb had the same trend as beef. It dropped continually by around 80 grams from 1979 to 2004. In addition, only minority people used fish for food, the consumption of Fish was stable at around 50 grams by whole period.
In conclusion, Chicken usage has the highest grow while Fish were the latest choice among all meats.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents an 61
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 42
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, look, third, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 780.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67065868263 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43194877477 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62874251497 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7427677713 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.9090909091 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1818181818 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140144431658 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550241534292 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548664463357 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088493621678 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454054992318 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.21 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.