The line graph compares the average consumption of fish and three kinds of meat in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, the amount of chicken eaten increased over that time, but the opposite was true for beef, lamb and fish. Initially, beef was the favorite food but it was replaced by chicken in the second half of the period.
In 1979, each person in this nation used about 220 grams beef per week, compared to about 150 grams chicken or lamb. Fish was the least popular food, with about 60 grams consumed weekly.
From that time to 2004, beef consumption reduced significantly to only about 100 grams, but the figure for chicken showed a dramatic rise to peak at about 250 grams each person. The average consumption of lamb declined gradually to just over 50 grams per week, and similarly, less fish was used in this nation, with its figure falling by about 15 grams a week
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Topic:Some people believe that living in big cities is becoming more difficult. what are the main problems people in cities face, and how can these problems be tackled 73
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun fish is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... over 50 grams per week, and similarly, less fish was used in this nation, with its ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 732.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60377358491 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23895837722 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591194968553 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3281094499 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133818028731 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787360349708 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948493061307 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11468999921 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111301415335 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.