The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:150%">The line
graph illustrates the amount of fish, beef, chicken and lamp consumed in a particular
European country over the course of 25 years starting from 1979.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:150%">An overview
is that the weekly consumption of chicken per person had an upward trend while the
reverse was true for fish and other kind of meat. And fish was the least
favorite food during this period.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:150%">In the
beginning year, beef was by far the most popular of these food, at 220 grams
which was one and a half that of chicken. After some fluctuations until 1989,
the consumption of beef witnessed a gradual decrease to just over 100 grams in
2004. However, there was a significant rise in the figure for chicken eaten
during the time given, which finally peaked at approximately 250 grams,
becoming dominant food.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;line-height:150%"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt;line-height:150%">Meanwhile, in
1979, the amount of lamb eaten was 150 grams, doubling the statistic of fish. Nevertheless,
the consumption of lamb dropped by 100 grams to about 70 grams, while there was
a stability in the figure for fish, which ended at 40 grams in 2004. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
- Nowadays international tourism is the biggest industry in the world Unfortunately international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Somepeoplethinksecondaryschoolstudentsshouldlearninternationalnewsasoneoftheirsubjects,whileothersbelievethatthisisawasteofvaluabletime.Discussbothviewsandgiveyourownopinion 11
- In modern societies, it is possible for people to go shopping, work andcommunicateviatheinternetwithoutface-to-facecommunication.Isitapositiveornegativedevelopment 89
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe over the 3 years 2005, 2009, 2015, compared with the European average. Summaries the given information and show comparison which relative 78
- Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 53, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...ar, beef was by far the most popular of these food, at 220 grams which was one and a half...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 965.302439024 171% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 8.46153846154 4.92477711251 172% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 14.047500895 2.65546596893 529% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.45097560976 138% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 200.478427767 43.030603864 466% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 330.0 112.824112599 292% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 39.0 22.9334400587 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 5.23603664747 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 18.0 3.83414634146 469% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844853591019 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634031466595 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0146657391665 0.0843802449381 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0436678656337 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395860538705 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 37.9 13.2329268293 286% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -1.95 61.2550243902 -3% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.2 10.3012195122 225% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 32.38 11.4140731707 284% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 31.5 11.4329268293 276% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 32.0 11.0658536585 289% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.