The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

The given line graph depicts the amount of consumption of 4 types of meat(Fish, Lamb, Beef, Chicken) in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The Overall studies concludes that the intake of chicken outweighed when compared to remaining three types and the consumption of fish was at the least.
Initially in 1979, beef was consumed at a higher rate i.e., more than 200 grams per week, but suddenly it got declined to 175 grams. Although we can observe a slight increase in 1989 but that rise is not constant. It gradually went on decreasing till 2004 upto 100g.
Chicken at first was consumed at 150g per week, after that there was constant rise and reached to 250. Consumption of Lamb also started with 150 in 1979 following an abridgement till 1999 and a modest gain in 2004. Fish from the starting had the lowest intake of 50 grams per week following
a slender declinment in 1984 and was constant till 2004.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'conclude'.
Suggestion: conclude
...een 1979 and 2004. The Overall studies concludes that the intake of chicken outweighed w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a higher rate i.e., more than 200 grams per week, but suddenly it got declined t...
^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to 175 grams. Although we can observe a slight increase in 1989 but that rise ...
^^
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as consumed at 150g per week, after that there was constant rise and reached to 2...
^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in 2004. Fish from the starting had the lowest intake of 50 grams per week follo...
^^
Line 4, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st intake of 50 grams per week following a slender declinment in 1984 and was con...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69135802469 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44920972109 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635802469136 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9168842464 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168589169934 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744629709242 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588660436688 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996747078106 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578017523941 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.